Sanjay Suvarna jailed!

Last Sunday (July 9), Sanjay Suvarna called the Police by dialling the Emergency 100 number. Residents had assembled together outside his home and were cleaning up the area of the Dukh Bhanjan Darbar Trust that Sanjay Suvarna had encroached. The encroached area was being used by Sanjay Suvarna for storage purposes - an area of roughly 4 feet X 10 feet was encroached.

On Sunday morning, residents just broke down the erected wall to safeguard the encroached area and started removing the tiles and other stuff stored in there.

When Police arrived, residents refused to budge or go to the police station. One after another, 3 police vans arrived - finally, the Senior Police Inspector of Worli Police Station reached the spot.

The Senior PI had a quick look and departed in 10 minutes - but before he did so, he did one hell of a clinical job in decision-making. He ordered an FIR to be registered against Sanjay Suvarna.

The most important section that Sanjay Suvarna was book under was IPC section 341 - "restraining movement of others". Sanjay Suvarna had sealed off the back-door of the trust with brick-work, so much so that if the door was opened, one would encounter a wall! - right outside the door!

Sanjay Suvarna was finally arrested at 5 pm - he spent the night in custody. Next day morning he reached home at 6:30 pm after paying his bail. In the end, the man would have suffered a minimum expense of Rs 10,000/- and perhaps even Rs 20,000/-

Besides he earns himself the right to be present in front of the court every month.

Contempt of Court?

Sanjay Suvarna made repairs to the structure on which the Bombay Civil Court has ordered a "status quo" by both parties, BMC and Sanjay Suvarna. On June 24, 2011, Sanjay Suvarna broke a wall and inserted a door and a window, clearly violating the status quo and committing a contempt for the court's order.

Yesterday, July 4, 2011, a BMC lady lawyer, who Sanjay Suvarna claims is being "managed" by his lawyer, connived to get the hearing adjourned to a future date, inspite of the Administrative Officer (AO) from the Estate Department being present in court for the hearing. The BMC lawyer, apparently, cared two hoots for the fact that this officer was in court in relation with a particular case. She made no attempt whatsoever to get the matter to be heard by the court, inspite of the judge asking if there was any other matters that lawyers wanted to be heard.

On the side note, the shoddy show of this lawyer pertaining to other cases of the BMC that she represented was there was all to see. No organization would ever have such an incompetent lawyer on their payroll, such shamelessly - it only has to be an Indian Governmental organization such as the BMC, indicative of the colossal corruption that permeates through this organization, right from the very top to the bottom.

The dog in BMC's G-South Ward

The dog in BMC's G-South ward that lives off the bits of Sanjay Suvarna has been identified.

This dog barks when we, residents harassed and suppressed by Sanjay Survarna's miscreant activity complain, but whimpers when Sanjay Suvarna's illegal, encroached construction is ordered to be demolished by higher-ups. The dog indeed is loyal to the master that feeds him.

When fate catches up with you ...

... your discrimation deserts you and the time to fall has come. (Vinaashakaale, viparita buddi)

The videos tell the story. Watch them!

Let's not write off Mumbai police (Chavan) ...really?

Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Prithviraj Chavan says we shouldn't write off Mumbai Police, and that Mumbai Police will investigate and find the killers of the criminal reporter.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Lets-not-write-off-Mumbai-police-Chavan/803496/

The Mumbai Police may as well nail Mr Dey's killers, but Sindhi Colony residents living in Worli can all vouch that the Mumbai Police won't nail Sanjay Suvarna. He is too "enriching" for them!

Is Sanjay Suvarna really a Senior Citizen? Or is he lying about his age?

1)      In an NC (# 1498/11 dated 12-5-2011) against Sanjay Suvarna by a resident of Sindhi Colony, Sanjay Suvarna mentioned his age as 64, and the police personnel that wrote the complaint on the resident’s behalf duly recorded it as so on the NC. On the same day, Sanjay Suvarna had also filed an NC against the resident.

2)      In our verbal conversations on the ground we have encountered several police personnel mention the senior citizen status of Sanjay Suvarna being an impediment for the Worli Police Station to take action against Sanjay Suvarna.

3)      We wish to bring forth before you the copy of the Ration Card of Sanjay Suvarna. This copy was filed as part of evidence in the Bombay City Civil Court, LC Suit No. 1206 of 2010. By virtue of being filed before a court the Sanjay Suvarna’s Ration Card copy could be procured by us.

4)      The Ration Card copy mentions the date of issue as 28 March, 2007. The age is also mentioned in this document as 52 (in Marathi). Another copy of an inside page of the Ration Card also once again mentions the age as 52 (in Marathi again).

5)      We would like to put on record that we cannot verify or un-verify the authenticity of this document – this was procured to us, once again, from the Bombay City Civil Court.

6)      In view of the disruptive activities of Sanjay Suvarna and his constant harassment, abusing and intimidation of residents, and his subsequent hiding behind the safety of being a senior citizen, we feel it would be worthwhile to bring this discrepancy to your notice.

7)      Any further action in this regard would be solely your prerogative.

Results pouring with the rains

While our efforts have tempered a bit in the last 2 weeks, the results however haven't. Along with the Mumbai downpour the great Indian elephant of bureaucracy finally began turning around.

Last week, a Police Officer of Worli Police Station informed us that Sanjay Suvarna's 100 calls won't be catered to anymore. Worli Police Station will no longer send in vans to the area, instead a Beat Marshall will be sent. Based on the situation, the Beat Marshall will recommend further action.

While this is laudable and means some action on the ground, there is still more to be done. For example, how about imposing a fine everytime Sanjay Suvarna calls up 100 for frivolous reasons. The Police very well has powers to do so - until this is not done the beast will continue his beastly ways.

On our part, the Police can be assured that residents will not give up their campaign against the thug until some real hard action is taken.